Clean and green fuel

PPO: Pure plant oil

There is a world outside the cities

Disproof of the ACP biofuel paper

N chain calculations

Energy contents of fuels

Rapeseed: A very special plant




These links show that the ACP biofuel paper and its sensational conclusions have been questioned by scientists from the very beginning.

Unfortunately, this has not been generally known.

Each of the papers linked to below addresses one or more of the subjects dealt with in sections 3.1 to 3.7 which hold specific objections in the Disproof of the ACP biofuel paper.

The following objections were unknown to the author until the Disproof had been completed; any information about other similar objections would be very much appreciated.

Kritik ein aktueller Lachgas-Studie
Comment in German by Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolfgang Friedt, Interdisziplinäres Forschungszentrum für biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen der Umweltsicherung (IFZ), Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
JRC report on Biofuels
Written by Giovanni De Santi (IE), Authors: Robert Edwards (IE), Szabolcs Szekeres (IPTS), Frederik Neuwahl (IPTS), Vincent Mahieu (IES), all at JRC
Crutzen-Studie (08/07)
Published by VDB, Verband der Deutschen Biokraftstoffindustrie, VDB

The following objections to the original ACP biofuel Discussion Paper were presented in the subsequent Interactive Discussion but were rejected by the authors, although some of them led to certain moderations in the final paper.
By Stefan Rauh and Stefan Berenz from Technische Universität München
By S. Donner from Princeton University
By C. Ammann, C. Spirig, C. Fischer, J. Leifeld, and A. Neftel, from Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART
By Adrian Leip from Joint Research Centre
By E. Smeets, A. F. Bouwman, and E. Stehfest, from Milieu- en Natuurplanbureau
By Anonymous Referee #2

You may send us an about this.

Back to Disproof of the ACP biofuel paper